In the provided context, “Post-AI” is presented less as a settled historical period than as a label that is being explicitly rejected. Kevin Abosch argues against the casual use of “Post-AI” by art critics and media, insisting that AI should not be understood as a temporary phase that has already passed. Instead, he describes AI as a structuring condition of society, comparable to electricity or language. From this perspective, AI is not something that can simply be placed in the past tense; it remains an ongoing framework that shapes perception, value systems, and social organization.
The context also shows that Abosch rejects media-specific labels such as “AI artist” or “crypto artist,” because they flatten the conceptual core of the work. He consistently identifies himself as a conceptual artist, emphasizing that technology is not the end goal. Rather, it is a tool for examining the epistemological limits of human society and for rethinking value itself. In this sense, “Post-AI” functions as a critical term: it names a tendency to treat AI as an exhausted trend, while the argument in the source insists that AI is still structurally active and culturally formative. The available context does not provide a broader, widely accepted definition of the term beyond this critique.